In case you happen to be following my scribblings, I just decided to work on some new material.
You can find it here: https://thesixtysecond.wordpress.com/2023/12/30/just-a-minute/
My Dad
Chris Turner

Way back in July 1939, dad was born in Sunningdale, in the Royal County of Berkshire. He would always make a point of stressing the royal bit. He came into the world precisely two months before war was declared. This may be an odd way to begin this piece, but it was one of those things about which he couldn’t resist telling anyone and everyone, while always reminding his family members, you know, just in case we’d forgotten. This was his claim to fame. He had a better one, more of which later. Thus, on the third day of September, every year, we would all be thinking about that fateful day when Neville Chamberlain announced that “a state of war would exist.” It is especially poignant in this case, because as a result, dad’s dad, Colin, died in Northern France, just four months later. How did dad become such a wonderful dad himself, when, but for those first few months, he had not enjoyed the love and care of his own father? He was quite exceptional. My two sisters and I cannot recall any kind of pressure to perform or to ‘be’ anything other than ourselves. He was always there, but never dominant, never overbearing, never demanding. His love was never stated – he would probably have seen that as rather gauche – but it was always evident in his actions. For such a big man, he was incredibly gentle and kind.
The information about the date of his birth immediately sets his life in some kind of remarkable perspective. The world today bears very little resemblance to that other world into which he was born; he was part of that generation which witnessed, or which experienced, or were affected by, some of the most significant changes of the 20th Century. The atom bomb, the Queen’s coronation, The Beatles, putting a man on the moon, the end of the tot (more of which later), decimalisation, colour television, Concorde, the Harrier Jump Jet, punk rock, the Internet, the Rubik cube, Top Gear, ATMs, speed cameras, skateboards, the Sinclair C5, Cadbury’s Creme Eggs, Countdown, microwave ovens, Pop Tarts, David Bowie, the 1966 World Cup, nice Skodas, smartphones, the Black & Decker Workmate. What a time to be alive! To illustrate (on a rather mundane level) how things have changed, dad was fond of telling how he once came ashore for a period of two weeks’ leave. Nothing unusual there, except for the fact that it was the practice at the time to give servicemen their pay in advance in cash, which meant he was sent off with a £5 note in his pocket. I forget the details, but I think it may have been the first time he’d ever had his hands on such a thing. The point is that he was effectively mildly traumatised by this, simply because he feared that he would not be able to get change of a fiver. Just imagine that. Poor old (young) thing!
While it may be a mundane example, it is also a fitting example of how dad cared; here he cared about not being a nuisance or being the cause of a problem for someone else. He’d have been really uncomfortable about handing over a white fiver to the newsagent, when all he wanted was that day’s Daily Telegraph.
Ah, The Daily Telegraph. Now, while some might see taking the Telegraph pretty much every day of his adult life (unless at sea, obvs) as something of a choice based on politics, rest assured that this was not the case in this instance. No, this is all about the cryptic crossword. Well, that and the obituaries, and the sport and the Letters to the Editor, but… mostly the crossword. It was a constant; it kept his brain ticking over; it challenged his resolve; it created a weekly talking point during Sunday morning telephone conversations with his beloved big sister, Mart. It has struck me recently that the cryptic crossword was a metaphor for how he lived his life. Let me explain. It’s largely to do with discipline, and rules, and experience, and knowledge, and the ability to think and to reason. A clue can only have one answer, pieced together and proven by the sum of its parts, but without knowing the rules, for a novice, a cryptic crossword can seem like it may as well be written in a foreign language. You can’t fake an answer to a cryptic crossword. Dad was never fake. If he couldn’t work out the answer to a clue, he’d ask me or mum or Mandy, or anyone else who might be in the room, to take a look. He could have just put in any old word, and pretended he was clever. He would never have done that. He was honest. He was smart, and rarely defeated. I suppose, what I’m suggesting is that the cryptic crossword somehow defined his life. He learnt the rules, he applied the rules, he lived by the rules. At the same time, he had an inherent curiosity, meaning that he’d want to know why the answer was correct. If he couldn’t prove it, he was frustrated. Most tellingly, in the final few weeks of his life, he lost interest in the crossword. In that final month, he told me just once that he wanted to pick up a pen and take a look. That look lasted a few minutes at best, and not a single clue was solved. He even asked me to cancel the newspaper subscription. I knew the end was nigh.
Anyone who spent time with dad would have experienced his unfailing curiosity. An obsession with the BBC News meant that bulletins at 1pm, 6pm and 10pm were an essential part of his day. Another trait was his habit of always checking for the origin of a product. He wanted to know where his shirts were made, where his yoghourts had been produced, where his apples were grown. Anything and everything which crossed his path. I guess this explains his exceptional level of general knowledge. You would always want him on your team in a quiz.
Dad was nothing if not modest. He wouldn’t brag about that time he kept the heads clear on the Hermes, wielding that faithful plunger. He wouldn’t shout about how he had been awarded two medals during his naval career, nor that he’d never been unemployed or claimed any kind of benefits. He wouldn’t blow his own trumpet. I don’t think he even had a trumpet. Nevertheless, as hinted earlier, he had one astonishing claim to fame, about which very few people knew. Yes, he’d once met a genuine superstar; a national treasure. In fact he even shook his hand, apparently. It was in Hong Kong. Who else, but Lionel Blair. Yes, I know. He could have dined out on that story for years, but I can barely recall him mentioning it. On balance, I think Lionel was a lucky man. Dad’s handshake was worth everything to me.
While it would be hard to define dad by his hobbies – I can’t think of anything you could describe as such, crosswords notwithstanding – it was rather revealing to witness the gifts bestowed upon him for his 80th birthday. Bottles of rum. Multiple bottles of rum. Often spiced rum. Yes, he had been a sailor. Yes, he enjoyed a tot or two. Yes, he occasionally enjoyed more than that, but the fact that so many felt the need to ply him with rum was testament to the fact that alcohol never spoiled him. He was not dependent on the stuff, but it made him happy; it helped to soften the pain; he was a big old kind-hearted softie, and with a tot or two in his veins, he was just a bigger, softer, old kind-hearted softie. Never aggressive, never belligerent, never angry, never anything but lovely. I’ve made a point of ordering some to share with visitors in the coming days, weeks and months.
While not so much a hobby, dad had a passion for shoes. Think Imelda Marcos, but without the high heels and corruption. He was always on the lookout for a bargain pair of Clark’s shoes. He’d struggle to walk past one of their shops without checking through the sale racks. I don’t think he ever paid full price – it’s not that he was mean – but a bargain is a bargain, especially where shoes are concerned. I know he did acquire one pair which wasn’t made by Clark’s. I know because he bought them in Singapore, and some years ago, he gave them to me. I’ll probably wear them later. He used to drink beer from them. That’s how much he loved shoes.
In 1982, dad re-joined HMS Hermes, and set sail for The Falklands. He’d left the ship not long before the conflict, but was recalled because the chap who had relieved him was away on leave, and as far as I can recall, could not be contacted. (Note, as stated above, it was 1982, long before people were able to communicate instantly.) It was a difficult time for those of us back home in England. The Hermes was a big old unit, carrying some rather important aircraft, so it was nothing if not a massive target. Dad often said that he never actually saw the Islands. The Hermes was stationed some 300 miles away, in the cold expanse of the South Atlantic. I recall the day the ship returned to Portsmouth; it was one of the happiest days of my life, knowing that dad had returned safely, plunger in hand. The weirdest thing about the whole episode, was the fact that dad was in an actual war – well, it was only a conflict, according to the history books. Whatever. He was the least likely person to actually want to fight, which begs the question “why the hell did he join the Navy?”, but that’s beside the point. He would often recount the story of when he was a young naval recruit, compelled to take part in a boxing match. Even in his late teens, he was 6’3” and 15 stone – a rather imposing figure, no doubt – but when put in the boxing ring and forced to fight, his tactic was to put his (much smaller) opponent out of action as soon as possible. He hated having to hit him, but he also didn’t want to be hurt himself, so he did the only thing he could to minimize the risk and the length of the bout. I think he’d describe himself as a lover, not a fighter.
At the turn of the Century, mum and dad upped sticks and moved from Gosport to Oswestry. Thus, the best part of a quarter of dad’s life was spent in Wilmot Drive. There was never a moment’s regret. The location, with Oswestry Cricket Club just there at the end of the garden, was ideal.
The importance of the cricket club should not be underestimated. He had almost no interest in the game of cricket itself, but the club became the hub of his social life for most of his time in Shropshire. He was able to make a number of good friends, and he was a regular at the bar, enjoying a few pints of the local beer, and perhaps a tot, if someone twisted his arm. The fact that the beer was always slightly too cold for his taste (I don’t think he ever mentioned it) didn’t detract from his fondness of the bar, and for its regulars and staff alike. He became part of the furniture over there, except that furniture doesn’t usually grumble about suffering from unspecified and indeterminate aches and pains. His presence will be sorely missed by all who shared some time with him. He would have been rather touched, albeit slightly embarrassed, by the fact that following news of his demise, the club flag was flown at half-mast for a suitably respectful period.
Dad lived for a rather impressive 30,541 days. He was a dad for 62 years and one day (he’d never have been so dramatic and insensitive as to have checked-out on Mandy’s birthday). He left us 4 years to the day after his aforementioned sister, Mart. I think he would have rather enjoyed the symmetry of that – the pair of them calling it a day on Valentine’s Day. Ha! There’s the drama. Just when you thought he would have wanted to slip away unremarkably, he pulled that one out. I’m sure there would have been a cheeky smile on his face and a glint in those beautiful blue eyes.
I should end with an acknowledgement of the marriage he enjoyed for 62 years, six months and one day (sixty-two and a half years precisely would have been too neat). Bearing in mind that mum and dad were married at a very young age, and were parents at the age of 19 and 21 respectively, their love survived all those years. I can best illustrate their unwavering affection for each other by assuring you that dad would always give mum a kiss before heading out of the house without her, even if it were just to walk along the road to the newsagent, or to the club at the end of the garden. He cared for her until the very end, best illustrated by two episodes I witnessed in the final weeks of his life. One morning in late January, I was helping dad to get back onto his bed. He was in so much pain, he could barely move. In the adjacent bathroom we heard mum fall – she hadn’t hurt herself too badly, although she did manage to land on the scales, which punched a hole in the wall – so I rushed in to help her up. By the time I’d got her to her feet, I turned to find dad in the doorway, concerned about her welfare. Never mind his own pain, he needed to check for himself that mum was okay. Of course he did. Then, just a week later, literally on his death bed, a discussion with the doctor ended with the obligatory question: “Is there anything else you want to ask, Chris?” Yes, there was. He expressed his concerns about what would happen to mum. He wanted to be there for her, and felt guilty that he’d had to leave her behind. Their enduring love was an example to us all.
He was my dad, but he was also my friend. I shall miss him immeasurably.
Identity
Is the crisis, can’t you see?
I’ll leave that there for the time being. Right now, there are so many questions. So few answers.
Yesterday, quite by chance (I forget exactly how I got there), I was confronted by an image accompanied by a statement from a proud parent. Here’s the image, albeit with the girl’s face cropped out to avoid any issues of privacy and whatnot.

Now, if you are being presented with this for the first time, (and you probably all fall into that category unless you happen to have followed my Internet browsing yesterday, which would be just a little bit weird), what do you see? What do you think the proud parent would have been so keen to publicise, here? What is going on in this moment which merits a Tweet? Indeed, so many questions you could be asking, nay, should be asking.
Dare I go on? Oddly, I’d largely forgotten about it by the time I eventually hit the sack, yesterday, but I woke after a night full of really bizarre and troubling, if not downright scary, dreams, and this was on my mind. I figure I need to work it through by making some notes and asking some questions.
Let me be clear. I am curious. I am not making any judgements. I cannot judge because I don’t understand. Hence, the questions. Genuinely, I want to make sense of what is happening. If I can’t do that, at least I may have some of the answers, but I ain’t holding my breath.
Back to the photograph. I recognise mushrooms and baked (haricot?) beans; I recognise plastics; I recognise processed stuff (or rather, I recognise that it is stuff that has been processed, not what it is). I suspect you may also be familiar with mushrooms, beans, plastics and processed foods.
So, what exactly was the father so proud to show to the world?
Okay, enough suspense. He wanted the Twittersphere to know that his daughter was enjoying her vegan lunch, subtitled with the fact that she is just one vegan in a school of 1,000 pupils. I have no problem with this. Call it a choice, call it her identity, call it what you will. It’s a free country (sort of). The dad is proud of his young daughter’s lifestyle choice, and that’s his prerogative, I guess (not least since he claims to be a nutritionist, so he must know what he’s doing, right?).
But, here I can’t help but return to the detail of the image. Look at the food. Mushrooms and beans (albeit beans which themselves have been processed, canned and transported some considerable distance) are the only recognisable natural foodstuffs. I fully admit that I don’t understand the vegan philosophy (and hence partially the reason for this post), but how does the philosophy fit with this smorgasbord of processing? I’m trying not to make light of it, but back in the summer I learnt that oat milk is a thing. I also learnt that oat milk is brought into the UK from Sweden. Just think about that for a moment. I’ve thought about it much more than is healthy, probably. Making milk from oats, for a start. Do oats even produce milk? Then, the costs (financial, ecological) of shipping it across the North Sea, never mind the cost of processing said oats to create said milk. So, what of the costs (ecological, financial) of producing all this processed food? I see plastic containers and packets; I see some kind of spread (margarine?); I see drink which is apparently both dayglow green and blue. What is that? It hasn’t been taken from the soil and placed in a cup, has it?
The problem is that is runs wider and deeper than this, doesn’t it? Imagine the cost to the world’s resources of all this processing, transporting, marketing and selling vegan(-friendly) products. I would understand if vegans only bought fresh, locally produced, fruit and vegetables. That would make sense, wouldn’t it? Take a silly(?) example: each time a lorry transports a few thousand gallons of oat milk down the M1 to your local Sainsbury’s distribution hub, how many thousands of insects are wiped from the face of the planet, and then wiped from the front of Eddie Stobart’s cabs? There is a cost to everything. How about when vegans visit non-vegan friends and relatives and proceed to consume additional energy to prepare their own meals, when a day or two eating their hosts’ food would surely not make a difference in the overall scheme of things? Would it?
In spite of what I noted earlier, I guess I am in danger of sounding judgmental. This is not my intention. I am simply trying to ascertain at which point it becomes acceptable/unacceptable to question these kind of choices? This brings me back, rather brilliantly, if I do say so myself, to where I began. The opening line to this rather fabulous record:
Here are the lyrics in full:
Identity
Is the crisis
Can’t you see?
Identity identity
When you look in the mirror
Do you see yourself?
Do you see yourself
On the TV screen?
Do you see yourself
In the magazine?
When you see yourself
Does it make you scream?
When you look in the mirror
Do you smash it quick?
Do you take the glass
And slash your wrists?
Did you do it for fame
Did you do it in a fit?
Did you do it before
You read about it?
Hardly on a par with Coleridge or Wordsworth, of course, but these lines speak to me like few others. Mostly, it is the final question. How much do we do of our own volition, and how much because we are somehow persuaded, coerced, conned, bullied, fooled, misinformed, encouraged? Would we really do all this stuff if we lived in a bubble, a vacuum, a cave, far from the influence of others? I somehow doubt it.
To be fair, I probably wouldn’t shave my legs if I hadn’t read about it in so many books about cycle racing, but the point stands. I am worried that so much of what we are confronted with today is simply a raft of identity politics, constructed, manufactured and (often) driven by dark forces (often) growing rich on the gullible. I hope that the public at large will be encouraged to ask more questions, perhaps as a result of reading this. Ms Poly Styrene would have been proud of me. And you, whatever your persuasion. Right?
Twenty Years On
I recently found myself thinking about an anniversary. Late September marked both my release from quarantine and the 20th anniversary of my joining Loughborough University. It came to mind, largely because of this picture, retrieved from my box of important crap, which has been stored in my room back in the UK ever since I quit those shores some nine years ago. I also found my IAM membership badge, but that’s another story.

Anyway, this rather magnificent piece was created by my good friend, Tom. The quality of the image ain’t great, simply because he made the drawing on a computer screen and I photographed the same with a primitive digital camera I’d borrowed from the lab. It was a Sony, I think, but the notable point was that the images were saved to a 3.5″ floppy drive.* None of your 64gb flash drives back then, dontchaknow? At least, nothing even close was available to poor students, so we made do with what we could get. I managed to print the image, then stuck it in a box where it remained folded and crumpled. No matter; it remains one of my favourite images.
Tom and I are some 20 years or so apart, but we soon bonded over a love of music. More specifically, as I recall, I introduced him to The Smiths and he, in turn, put me in touch with Pavement. I never could decide who got the best out of that exchange, but in view of recent issues concerning one SP Morrissey, I think it was probably yours truly. Indeed, I am still discovering Pavement tracks, thanks to the wonders of the Internet and Spotify.
Nothing really matters. This is the point. The longer I live, the more this makes sense. I just looked up the definition of nihilism, and while I have never considered myself nihilistic – yes, I reject religion, but I have quite clear moral principals – I am coming to the rather inevitable conclusion that young Tom was pretty much bang on the money. Bearing in mind he was perhaps only 20 years old at the time, and could barely recall the correct order of the twelve months of the calendar (I kid you not), I think it was rather profound. I must have thought so at the time, too. Why else would I have bothered to capture the image?
It seems to me now, as I wallow in my late fifties, (still) struggling to make sense of life in a strange land, struggling the best I can to raise and nurture two delightful children, struggling to make myself understood, struggling to persuade those close to me that I need help, struggling to stop sweating my arse off for 8 months each year, struggling to stay alive on the roads while those all around me could not care less, and struggling to find the conclusion to this point, that nothing really matters. On about the most serious level I can think of, should one of my children go on to find the cure for cancer, it still would not actually matter. Would it? In the end, there is only the end.
The end.
*Edit: couldn’t resist checking with Messsssrs Goooooogle. Here you go:

Remember, like, to ‘like’ and follow, like (and Subscribe, like)
Like.
Perhaps the most common word in the English language right now. Listen to pretty much anyone under the age of 53, and this will punctuate their every sentence, not to mention their every visit to any website, app or hospital Emergency Department. We seem to be predisposed to want to indicate that we like absolutely anything and everything, irrespective of its merit, likeability or appropriateness. “Wow! That photograph I posted has had 445 likes already!” Really? Which one? “That one of you in a hospital bed with tubes protruding from every orifice.” Oh, how nice. It’s become irrelevant; an automatic response; utterly pointless. Unless, that is, you are some kind of so-called ‘influencer’, or you are making a few quid from your personal social media stream.

I tend to avoid the ‘like’ button like the plague. Perhaps I should say, I tend to avoid the ‘like’ button as if it were riddled with disease. Yes, that feels rather more appropriate to this particular page of woe, like.
Imagine sitting in a bar, chatting with some friends. Sure, we all give off signals to indicate that we find something amusing, or appealing, or maybe even somewhat repellant, but we don’t sit there interspersing the conversation with countless exclamations of approval. Do we? No, I don’t think so. A conversation is pretty much just that. We’re not sitting there wondering how it ranks against previous conversations. Perhaps we’ll return to the same subject matter next time we sit down for a pint and a pork pie, but we’re not going to be poised, in a state of mild tension or luke warm anticipation, thinking that we need to measure how enjoyable it will be compared to the last time. “Damn it! Bob barely registered a nod of approval this time, so I suppose the aural picture I just painted was less hilarious ‘epic fail’ and more instantly forgettable cute kitten falling off a sofa.”
Anyway, the reason I came this way today is entirely connected to this outlet of mine. Occasionally, some of you (dear readers) feel inclined to like my posts, and some will even leave a comment or two. I guess that is kind of nice and reassuring. In fact, I get so few such interactions, that it is actually still quite exciting to see the little bell with an orange dot alongside (in the top right corner of my WordPress web page). To think that some people I know in real life are reading and enjoying(?) what I write is rather comforting, but my problem is this… I sometimes receive a notification of a ‘like’ within seconds of posting a new rant, observation, story, memo, missive or whatever. Frankly, it is impossible that said liker has had the chance to read what I have written, let alone formed an opinion about its undoubted likeability, so what is the point? If you are able to enlighten me, any of you who may self-identify as a serial immediate-liker, I’m all ears.
[Edit: Below is a screen grab from a few seconds after I posted this. The orange dot of delight.]

I feel I should end with a comment on something about which I hinted a few weeks ago. That there YouTube website. Almost invariably, a posting on there begins or ends with the presenter reminding we viewers to Subscribe, Like and Comment (below). Yawn. I think most people filter out this stuff anyway, rather like – sorry…, rather akin to those wretched hi-vis yellow/orange jackets/tabards required of certain health and safety type scenarios. In other words, they are now so commonplace, the value is diminished. Probably. Anyway, the point I am coming to is that I have seen a number of films featuring one James May, he of Top Gear and Grand Tour fame, of whom I remain rather fond in a kind of middle-aged-bloke-I-wouldn’t-mind-having-a-pint-with way. He seems positively irritated, if not embarrassed, at having to slip in the old S, L & C (b) request, each and every time he is faced with a Go-Pro for an 8-minute introduction to his latest purchase. And so it was that I found myself pleasantly surprised, nay delighted, that on my current favourite, The Late Brake Show, Jonny Smith Esq. makes no desperate appeal for mugs like me to click that button. You see, it doesn’t have to be that way, and talented people can still produce quality material.
Wheelchair Bound?
Take a moment think about what that term means. I’ll freely admit that it is an expression I would have used in the past. Before I took a moment to think about what it actually means.
I am posting just a few words of my own, here, then I strongly recommend you read what follows. I’ve nicked it from my niece. She happens to have a disability and happens to use a wheelchair. It’s a pretty serious disability, so she uses a wheelchair, or should I say her wheelchair rather a lot. She is certainly not bound by it.
I don’t want to detract from what you are (hopefully) about to read, but I would like to point out that Elizabeth is (to me, at least) rather special. She is actually pretty special in that her condition is the result of about a one in a billion chance, or maybe it was one in fourteen billion. Whatever. A billion is a big number, so you get the point. She is special to me, however, largely because I have known her since she was born – 30 something years already – and in all that time I have not once heard her grumble, complain or bitch about her condition. Not once. Yes, she has cause to grumble, complain and bitch about how people treat her because of her condition, but that is quite a different matter. I guess what I’m suggesting is that she has never sought pity. She’s just a normal young mum, dealing with the same things as everyone else, but in her own way and with help from those around her when necessary. I guess I should say that she is defined, to some extent, by her disability, albeit not in any negative sense. She is certainly not defined, bound nor confined by her wheelchair.
So, there we are. I have said more than enough. Please, read on.
HAVE YOU TRIED WALKING LATELY?

WHY WAS THE RECENT “A DAY IN MY WHEELS“ CAMPAIGN SO AWFUL?
This is so multifaceted I don’t even know where to begin. The campaign “a day in my wheels“ was started by a disabled individual, Sean O’Kelly, in an attempt to get abled people to understand what it’s like living with a disability where you need to use a wheelchair. Spinal Injury Ireland then took this phrase and used it as the tagline to challenge celebrities and politicians in Ireland to get them to understand what challenges Wheelchair users face. You might think, “oh that’s a nice thing to do“, and on the surface maybe it is. But there is nothing superficial about being in a wheelchair. This campaign was highlighted to me on Instagram stories, where a friend of mine had posted the video by Lorraine Keane, who had spent 24 hours pretending to be ‘disabled’.
1. Whose wheels? A day in my wheels – this is problematic right from the get go as everybody has a different experience in their own wheelchair. This could be because of their own disability or abilities, what they struggle with, what they don’t struggle with, whether they have somebody to help them or whether they are able to live independently. There isn’t a generic wheelchair user – everyone’s experience is completely different. To make this challenge at all realistic, would be almost impossible. It’s not enough to just sit in a wheelchair or put on a blindfold to know what it’s like to live with a disability. An able body sat in a wheelchair demonstrates literally nothing about the wheelchair user’s real experience. I can’t imagine disabled celebrities went into the public toilet, and shuffled awkwardly onto the wobbly toilet seat. They would’ve stood up, without the risk of falling and sitting in somebody else’s wee on the floor.
2. Playing dress-up by trying on a wheelchair for 24 hours shows you absolutely nothing about what it’s like to live as a wheelchair user – this includes people with spinal cord injuries and all sorts of other disabilities. As I’ve said, everyone’s disability and experience in a wheelchair is different and unique, and even for a specific wheelchair user every day can be different. You could take public transport to your workplace every day (many of us do actually work, shocking) and every day you have the stress of whether the bus that turns up will be accessible. What if it isn’t? How do you get to work then? Is there a local taxi firm that will take you in your wheelchair? What if a bolt comes loose on your wheelchair and you can’t fix it yourself? What if your stoma bag leaks and you’re not near an accessible toilet? None if these sort of themes were addressed at all.
3. The pity. The video from Lorraine Keane was choc-full of one main theme – pity. It was quite sickening. The words from her mouth were along the lines of counting her blessings that she’s not a wheelchair user, and how awful her day had been. There was sadness and dispair over not being able to pick somebody up in a car – because wheelchair users can’t possibly drive, right? There were assumptions around not being able to walk her dog, go for a sea swim or even pop to the shops. What does she think we do all day? Seriously?! Does she think wheelchair users do nothing of pleasure or have their own responsibilities? She started off the video beautifully, saying she thought she knew about what being disabled was like because she has three friends who are Wheelchair uses, which we all know is the global qualification for understanding disability. She went on to say “I cannot tell you how relieved I am to get out of that wheelchair”.

4. Spinal Injuries Ireland sanctioned this – what on earth were they thinking?! I know we’ve got a way to go to make attitudes towards disabled people better around the world. But Ireland, I mean come onnn. What decade are you stuck in? Are you going to be handing out free pats on the head, like literal ones?

5. The wheelchairs themselves – if you’re going to put on the wheelchair as your hero outfit for the day, make it realistic. The kind of ill-fitting chairs they sat in with their legs splayed apart, just perpetuates the ugly “poor them having to sit in those horrible things“ idea. Many wheelchair users have a chair which has been provided for them, often made-to-measure, and if it’s not provided by a wheelchair service, it has probably been bought privately and cost thousands of pounds/euros/dollars. You don’t often see a regular wheelchair user using this sort of supermarket style borrowed wheelchair. Surprisingly, many of us quite like the way our chairs look, and take pride in the appearance of our wheelchair as well as its functionality.
6. Please, please stop talking about disabled peoples lives without actually involving us. A lot of campaigning and fundraising happens for good reasons but often does not involve and consult actual disabled people living lives with all sorts of mobility aids, sensory or physical impairments learning difficulties. there is this notion of “we doing this for you, surely you can appreciate that”. But the problem is they’re not doing it for us, if they were they would’ve asked our opinions on whether this was a good idea before it even was allowed to happen. This was a stunt to make people in power feel better about themselves, to give commiserations to people whose bodies work a bit differently. In this wheelchair-pantomime there was no mention of systematic or societal changes that need to take place. There was no talk about the success of wheelchair users and disabled people, our talents and skills and how we can thrive and contribute given the access to what we need and want, by being given a voice and being listened to. There were massive leaps to ridiculous conclusions: “I was late for everything” – that has nothing to do with being a wheelchair user my dear. Yes some things might take longer but most of us can manage our daily timetables and not turn up late all the time. There was nothing about the fact that these wheelchairs, our mobility aids, give us freedom. Without my wheelchair I wouldn’t be able to go anywhere.
7. If you want to know what it is actually like to live with a disability, get to know somebody with a disability. Talk to them, ask them what the barriers are, what needs to change and what we can do together to change it. Involve us. Don’t feel sad for us, we are not your pity porn.

You can read more from Lizzy, here:
Oh, for fuck’s sake!
As previously, I should preface this with an admission, a disclaimer, a statement, if you will, of my deep love of Taiwan. The people, the food, the climate, the work ethic, the healthcare system (although, this has taken a bit of a dip of late as you will see if you read on, dear friend), the mountains, the packaging. I could go on, but suffice to say, for the most part, I like living here. It is difficult to criticise the overall way of life, taking everything into consideration. Sure there are faults, but compared to many places, this is a special place to call my home.
So, what’s the problem?
Frankly, it stems from a sense of deep frustration that it impossible to reason with certain people/practices/systems. I have yet to come across anyone here who is prepared to put their head above the metaphorical parapet and use a little common sense. Indeed, as I think I have noted elsewhere, common sense seems to have been eradicated from the collective psyche and/or DNA. Sometimes, I just need an individual to exercise some sympathy, or show empathy, or display a modicum of said common sense, in response to certain situations. Time and time again, I have failed to persuade a person who is wholly significant to the problem at hand, to stop and think about the very problem I have identified, nor consider the/a solution I have offered, nor the cause of the problem. Not once have I found someone who is prepared to say “yes, I see you have a (good) point, Colin. I think we should deal with/consider this.” Now, I’m not expecting special treatment, just reasonable treatment, since I’m a relatively intelligent bloke and I am not unreasonable in my thinking. Am I? Maybe I am, and I just can’t see it. That would also be helpful to know, but I don’t even get that kind of feedback. Invariably, it’s just a blank look, as if to say “that’s really not my problem, mate.”
Details, mister. Details.
In no particular order.
Just this evening, while on a bike ride, I called in at a 7-Eleven and purchased a snack and a tasty beverage. I spotted six empty tables in a line along the length of the shop, adjacent to the window. Six chairs accompanied these tables. That’s one at each, of your were wondering. I asked the staff member I might avail myself of their fine snack consumption facilities. Sure thing, sir. I sat myself down and opened the drink carton, at which point the same staff member called across and told me that I had to sit facing outwards, not facing to the side looking towards the door of the establishment, as I had chosen. Jesus H Freaking Curreist. There were no other tables in use. In that moment, I died a little inside, got up and left the building, opting to finish my refreshments on the pavement.

As you may be aware, I was recently held in quarantine. I have no issue with that, on the grounds that I knew it was coming on my return from the UK. I did not, however, appreciate that I would be denied access to any exercise. I asked for assistance. None was offered. I gave up. I finally left the facility on Monday morning. I had to wait approximately 5 minutes, at which time I turned around and spotted an open quadrangle. You know the kind of thing… an open-air space contained within the four sides of the building, with no direct access to the outside world (other than over the roof), where I could quite happily have walked laps for an hour. The access to this space was perhaps 50 metres from the door to my room. I could have walked there down a deserted corridor in a matter of seconds. I could have walked alone, in the fresh air, perhaps absorbing a little vitamin D. Why was this not even considered as an option? Surely someone might have thought it a good idea. Surely? Surely not.


As I sit here typing, I am still in some considerable pain. For the past several weeks, I have had intermittent excruciating pain in my right shoulder. A GP in the UK diagnosed subacromial impingement and suggested ibuprofen to help with the pain, assuring me that it would eventually clear up. Fair enough. I decided to tough it out, but asked Mrs T to arrange an appointment with a specialist back here in Taiwan, just to be sure the diagnosis was correct and to check that nothing more sinister was happening. Fast forward to my leaving quarantine.
I should preface this section with confirmation that I have had two doses of the AZ vaccine (opting to get it done and paying for the privilege before it all kicked off out here); I have been tested six times in the past seven weeks (all negative); I spent 14 days and 15 nights quarantine in (effectively) a concrete cell, having zero contact with other humans. On release, I was allowed to take a taxi to the High Speed Railway station in HsinChu, where I waited for an hour among several hundred other passengers, from where I boarded a busy train to Tainan. The journey lasted approximately 80 minutes. From this, you might deduce that I was not considered a risk. However, the very next morning, I made my way to NCKU hospital in Tainan, only to be flagged on presenting my Health Service ID card at the entrance. I was denied access to the doctor and ejected from the building. I’m not ashamed to admit that I sat outside and wept, but I am ashamed to tell you that not one healthcare worker took it upon themselves to check why an old man was sat outside their hospital, clearly in a state of some discomfort and despair. As the youth of today might put it: fucks given? Zero.
You see, the problem is that when you (well, I) get into this kind of situation, there is absolutely nothing I can do. There is no “That’s Life” and no ‘Watchdog”, or whatever the modern equivalent might be; I cannot speak to anyone who would either show any interest or admit any responsibility, so finding an individual who might exercise some discretion and (dare I say) common sense, is simply impossible. This is why I despair. The best I can do is have a good cry, as I sit and mourn the loss of my ability to seek any kind of solution.
Just to ram the point home slightly further, I should also regale you with a road-use story from a few months ago. Of course, road behaviour is a particular interest of mine, so to find myself on the wrong end of this ridiculous scenario was especially galling. I’ll try to be brief, but bear with me.
Every day, I drive ten kilometres to collect my son from school. I take the same route, day in, day out, unless there is some kind of roadworks and/or diversion. On the day in question, it was perfectly normal. The very last junction before I arrive at the school is at a major intersection where I have to make a U-turn, by turning left. It is on a four lane road. The two lanes on the right are marked with an arrow for those wanting to go straight ahead, while the two on the left are marked with a left turn arrow. There are traffic lights. The straight ahead green arrow comes first, then the left turn green arrow follows some 30 seconds or so later. Thus, I am sure you would understand that if you happen to be in one of the two left lanes and you happen to wait for the green light to allow for the turn, then it would be safe to turn left. Not only that, you would be expected to turn left. If you were wanting to go straight ahead, or turn right, you’d not be in that lane. Surely, even the dimmest of halfwits could see that this is the case. Had you made a mistake, and realised you actually wanted/needed to go straight, or indeed right, then it would make sense to give a signal to go right from the lane (or preferably just make the left turn and then turn around when it is safe to do so, although, to be fair, such thinking would be beyond most drivers’ ability here). Let’s assume you want to turn left. In a lane in which you have to turn left. Waiting for a green light to allow you to turn left. At which point in this scenario are you thinking “that bloke ahead of me needs to be indicating left, because I have absolutely no idea what he’s going to do”? Because you would think that, right? No, left.
You might want to read the captions. You know, just for clarity.




No, of course you wouldn’t. Except that the bell-end behind me decided to send dashcam footage of me turning left at this junction without giving a left turn signal. The footage was sent to the Old Bill. They sent me a fine for NT$1,200. No amount of reasoning on the phone (explaining all of the above) made the slightest difference. Jim Jobsworth at the local cop shop was not interested. If you are turning, you have to give a signal. How could anyone in their right mind think that this fine was justified? FFS. I give up. Again.
I probably shed more tears.
Footnote
More precisely, I suppose, this should be called subtitle. Read on, and prepare for your mind to be blown. Mine is still in pieces.
I’ll keep it brief.
In my last missive, if indeed that is what I should call it, I mentioned three things that had helped me through my period of incarceration. Go and have another look if you can’t remember, or read it now to bring yourself up to speed. It’s kind of essential that you are on the same page before you proceed.
If you’re sitting comfortably, and trust me on this, you will need to be seated when you realise the enormity of what I am about to reveal, then I’ll begin. Then, I’ll end.
Begin: the very next morning, after writing “Two Weeks Barefoot”, I woke at around 5 o’clock [that’s 5am in the morning, for those of you who know my feelings on this]. I had a couple of hours to kill while awaiting my taxi, so (among other mundane tasks) I decided to squeeze in another episode of Brooklyn Nine-Nine. Imagine my amazement when a character was introduced as Inspector Knausgaard.

End: that’s it. So what, I hear you ask. So what? In my last post, two of the things I had just cited as being helpful to my survival being linked like this! So what? Two things entirely unrelated, cited in my last post. The name Knausgaard in an episode of Brooklyn Nine-Nine. What are the chances? Seriously?
I tried a screen grab to present the evidence, for I fear some of you may doubt the veracity of my words. The image on screen failed, but I managed to capture the episode detail (top left) and the subtitle. See?

But wait… there’s more. The actor playing Inspector Knausgaard was a chap called Jonny Smith.

Okay, that last bit I just made up. It was in fact Anders Holm. That would have been just too weird, although I understand that Anders Holm translates from the Swedish as The Late Brake Show.
I’m off for a lie down.
Two Weeks Barefoot
I know what you’re thinking. What would be your Native American name? For what it’s worth, I also considered 14 Days Shoeless and Fortnight Sans Shoes, but I had to settle for the Barefoot option. You know it makes sense, right?
Honestly, I am somewhat conflicted. I woke this morning and thought about the reality of my plight. This is my final full day of being incarcerated; I’ve made it through two weeks. Do I want to remember this? I’m not sure that I do. I have spent two weeks of my life in a box, with nothing on my feet. I think that’s what brought it home to me better than anything else. Yes, I did first consider the fact that it is now 15 days since I walked through the front door of mum and dad’s house, taking the first steps on my long journey home, and it won’t be until this time tomorrow that I should be back in the arms of my wife and children. I consider that to be excessive. I did also consider the fact that I have had almost zero contact with any other human beings for the entirety of my stay here – I see nobody, hear nobody; when I open the door to grab my meals (which are left on the table outside), the corridors are deserted; I communicate with my faceless/nameless handler through a mobile phone application. I consider all that to be extremely weird. I then considered the fact that I have had almost no exercise, save for some minutes each day pacing up and down my room – maybe 10 metres each way – when I am used to cycling 8-10 hours each week. I’ve been wondering how this is going to affect my body. I consider it inhumane that no provision is made for exercise of this inmate, and I use that term deliberately, as we all know that even convicted criminals are allowed some time each day to get out into an exercise yard. (Probably).


No, it was the recognition of the fact that I have not had anything on my feet for two weeks that made me realise that this has been truly exceptional period of my life. Save for when I was a babe in arms, when would this ever have been possible before? Never. Thus, here I am, soul searching inspired by my left sole and my right sole. I want to refer to them as my L sole and my R sole, but that sounds wrong. Sorry.
So, I am here, drafting one more chapter. Two weeks without shoes or footwear of any kind. (They did supply some of those hotel-style slipper things, but they are never big enough.) Slipping back into my old shoes tomorrow morning will be just like…, well, slipping into an old pair of shoes, I suppose. I can’t wait. Simple pleasures. Simple things we take for granted, like the necessity of shoes, and yes, other people.

To be fair, I enjoy my own company; I like to be alone, but I don’t want to be lonely. Thank Gawd for LINE, for Facetime, for Whatsapp, for Messenger, eh? Those close to me have been in touch and helped to keep me sane, all through the wonders of magic fairies in these electric boxes in front of and beside me. Imagine being denied that.
As I have already mentioned, I am conflicted. I really don’t want to remember this time, but I think it would also be foolish if I were to forget. (By the way, I would definitely forget, because my memory is so appalling, so I have to write something.) If nothing else, I want to take something positive from the experience. Something positive to justify the total waste of 0.069% of my life so far (15 days/nights of 21,649 days/nights on this planet).
For the record, here are a few positives.
I discovered something enjoyable on Netflix. Brooklyn Nine-Nine. Probably not to everyone’s taste, but it makes me smile and, on occasion, laugh out loud. LOL.

I have been mesmerised by Karl Ove Knausgaard’s A Death in the Family: My Struggle 1, for which I shall be eternally grateful to my dear old Uncle Rob*.

In the past couple of days I have discovered a Youtube gem: The Late Brake Show, and I just wanted to put it out there as an antidote to the overwhelming stench of most of the other Youtube stuff through which I have waded. I planned to pen a bit of a rant on the Youtube culture of today, but this show, fronted by Mr Jonny Smith, ex of Fifth Gear fame, is genuinely exceptional. If you like that kind of thing.
https://www.youtube.com/c/TheLateBrakeShow
Most importantly, I have discovered that life is empty without freedom. I guess that sounds utterly vacuous. It’s hardly the revelation of the century, but if you are an aging, balding, pessimistic, grumpy, insecure, forgetful, caring, analytical, stick-insect of a man, it is necessary to acknowledge that life is too short. I am in my present predicament precisely because I wanted to go home to spend some time with my dear old mum and dad, because I may not get too many more opportunities to do the same. Four weeks with them and two weeks in here. In spite of all I have just written, it was worth it.
Now it’s time to pack my bags. That’ll kill another thirty seconds. See you on the other side, folks.
*You were right, of course!
Plumbing the Depths
This is one for die-hard fans. Yippee ki yay, muthafudgers!
Imagine me writing about a Willis/Rickman Christmas/not Christmas fillum tour de force, eh. The smart ones will notice the absence of a question mark. Yes. It’s not a question, it’s an instruction. If you want it (i.e. me writing about the quintessential American action film directed by John McTiernan), you’ll just have to imagine it. I ain’t going there.
No sir. This is much more gripping. It’s all about plumbing. Actual plumbing. More than that, it’s about one of those Taiwanese things that has been troubling me for many a year. Are you sitting comfortably? Then I’ll begin.
Take a look at this:

And this:

And this:

And this:

You’ve spotted the issue. Pretty exciting stuff, right?
Okay, then. How about this:

And, finally, this:

Yes. I’m bored. I am bored, but this is genuinely something that’s bothered me for several years.
I see exactly the same thing everywhere I’ve stayed in Taiwan. From Taipei in the north to Kenting in the south; Taidong on the east coast to Tainan on the west. It genuinely is an island-wide phenomenon.
I call it the leave-the-plastic-film-on-the-blanking-plate syndrome. If you are reading this in Taiwan, go to a kitchen or bathroom right now. It is almost certain that you will find evidence of this same syndrome. In fact, you should also check the mirrors. I just did, virtually. Yes, I just looked at a property rental website and found these three examples within a matter of seconds. What do you see on the corners of these mirrors?



You got it. It’s the leave-the-plastic-protectors-on-the-corners syndrome.
I know what you’re thinking. You’re thinking that this confinement has finally defeated me. I am now a basket case.
I accept that this is pretty trivial stuff, but, as noted above, it does bother me. It bothers me because it’s just a teensy weensy bit weird. How is it that nobody thinks it’s odd to leave the protective stuff on these things? Once the blanking plates are fitted, that’s it. They just sit there covering up an untidy hole. Once the mirrors are fitted, they just hang there. They are not knocking up against other stuff. Are the plumbers and mirror hangers contractually obliged to leave these things in place? It’s fucking weird. It wouldn’t be if it was only something you saw in one or two places, but it genuinely isn’t. It is the standard; the default.
More seriously, this is where it leads… Every single time I see a news programme on the television, here (admittedly not that often as we don’t have a TV), there will be film of one or more road traffic incidents. They are almost always the same – one of perhaps half a dozen scenarios. There’s no point describing them. The point is, however, that this is the default position. When will people wake up to the fact that this is madness? A madness that could be fixed if only they would WAKE UP.
Probably just after plumbers and window hangers wake up to the fact that the protective stuff can be removed.